Good Coding Assessments Take Hours. Assessment Agent Takes Minutes.
Assessment Agent drafts your coding assessment content through a guided conversation. It writes the problem statements, starter code, candidate instructions, and a proposed set of test cases with expected outputs. You review, edit, and submit.
- Coding Assessments · Live Task
- Coding Assessments · Take Home
Why coding assessments get recycled or skipped
The authoring bottleneck
A solid coding assessment for a specific role takes real time. The recruiter has to know what to test, write a clear problem statement, pick a language, provide starter code, and then author enough test cases to actually separate a working solution from a broken one (the part that eats up the most time). Most recruiters do not have that time per role. The result is that assessment content drifts toward recycled off-the-shelf problems, or the assessment gets skipped and the burden shifts onto interview rounds that cannot carry it all.
Where this sits in the platform flow
Talent CRM
Candidates sourced and nurtured
Recruitment Software
Candidates apply to jobs
Candidate Evaluation
Assessment AgentAssessment Agent operates here
Screening & Hiring
Interview rounds and offers
Assessment Agent prepares the assessment rounds before candidates reach them.
Role Requirements In. Ready-to-Edit Assessment Out. Recruiter Owns Submission.
Skill & Knowledge (Domain) Assessments are authored today in the Domain Assessment builder. Recruiters compose questions as Text field, Multiple choice, or Single choice, set a time duration and passing score, and route open-text answers to Review & Score. AI drafting for Domain assessments is on the roadmap, so talk to your account team about availability.
Recruiter names the assessment and says how many coding questions it should contain
Assessment Agent generates the question set, with a problem statement, candidate instructions, and starter code for each question
Recruiter chooses the language for the assessment and whether to include AI-generated test cases
Assessment Agent proposes test cases, including edge cases and expected outputs for each question
Recruiter reviews the summary, regenerates or edits any question, then submits. The draft lands in the Coding Assessments builder for final editing and publishing
Recruiter names the assessment and says how many coding questions it should contain
Assessment Agent generates the question set, with a problem statement, candidate instructions, and starter code for each question
Recruiter chooses the language for the assessment and whether to include AI-generated test cases
Assessment Agent proposes test cases, including edge cases and expected outputs for each question
Recruiter reviews the summary, regenerates or edits any question, then submits. The draft lands in the Coding Assessments builder for final editing and publishing
Recruiter names the assessment and selects the language
Assessment Agent drafts the task instructions and starter code
Recruiter reviews and submits. The task becomes available for scheduled live coding sessions in the platform's built-in audio and video rooms
Two coding-assessment types, one scoring pattern
- Take Home / Coding
- Automatic against test-case results (pass/fail per case)
- Live Task / Coding
- Reviewed against the live session output and test cases
- Skill & Knowledge / Domain (manual authoring)
- Objective questions auto-scored, open-text answers scored in Review & Score, relative to the assessment's Passing Score
Every type feeds the Scoreboard, where the candidate's Average Score aggregates assessment and interview-round scores.
A Draft Is a Draft. The Recruiter Decides What Goes Live.
Assessment Agent never publishes on its own. It fills the assessment builder, and the recruiter reviews the generated questions, test cases, and instructions, edits anything, and is the one who submits and publishes.
Agent drafts
Fills the assessment builder with questions, test cases, and instructions
Recruiter reviews and edits
Checks and adjusts every generated question and test case
Recruiter publishes
Submits when ready. Nothing goes live without approval
What stays with the recruiter
Final assessment content, every question and every test case
Passing thresholds and time limits
Language and configuration
Which roles use which assessments
Whether to submit, regenerate, or discard
Bias considerations
Assessment Agent is designed as a drafting aid, not a hiring decision-maker. uRecruits is implementing a Responsible AI Program designed around human oversight, job-related AI use, transparency, candidate rights, fairness, auditability, and governance for U.S. hiring technology. Customers remain responsible for selecting, configuring, validating, and using assessments appropriately for their roles and applicable hiring obligations.
Three of the uR Position Workflow Components Are Assessment-Type.
Three of the core Position Workflow components are assessments: Functional/Domain Assessment, Live Task/Coding Assessment, and Take Home/Coding Assessment. Assessment Agent generates the content for the two coding components today.
Take Home / Coding Assessment
Problem statements, starter code, candidate instructions, and test cases for async coding
Live Task / Coding Assessment
Live task prompts and starter code for scheduled live sessions in built-in audio and video rooms
Functional / Domain Assessment
Authored manually today, with AI drafting on the roadmap
The recruiter configures which assessments belong in a given role's workflow (with help from Workflow Agent if desired), and Assessment Agent prepares the content for the coding assessments in that workflow.
What Teams Get From Assessment Agent
Assessment design time
Move from a blank page to a ready-to-review coding assessment draft faster.
Test-case coverage
A proposed set of test cases (including edge cases) generated per question, instead of hand-writing each.
Per-role specificity
Assessment content matched to the topic and language you specify, instead of recycled problem banks
Reviewer workload
Recruiters focus on editing and calibrating rather than blank-page authoring
* Customer results vary.
Included in your plan
Assessment Agent is included in the Candidate Assessment Package and Full Cycle Package, operating on the Coding Assessments surface in both.
Assessment Agent FAQs
At minimum, an assessment name, the number of questions, and the programming language. It will also ask whether to include AI-generated test cases and about optional package support.
Assessment Agent supports a range of common programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C++, C#, and Go. Confirm the current supported list with your account team.
Yes. When you opt in, it proposes a set of test cases per question, each with inputs and expected outputs, including edge cases. The recruiter can edit them before submitting.
Yes. Every generated question, instruction, and test case is editable, and you can ask the agent to regenerate questions before you submit.
Domain assessments are authored today in the Domain Assessment builder, using Text, Multiple choice, and Single choice questions with a passing score and time limit. AI drafting for Domain assessments is on the roadmap, so ask your account team.
No. Assessment Agent drafts assessment content for recruiter review. Candidate responses are evaluated through the applicable assessment workflow, for example coding test-case results or configured objective scoring, and results are surfaced to authorized users. Hiring decisions remain with the employer.
On the candidate's Scoreboard, with per-assessment scores shown alongside interview-round scores. The composite Average Score aggregates across all scored rounds.
Yes. Once created, an assessment can be referenced from any role's Position Workflow.
Draft Your Next Assessment Faster
The next coding assessment you configure can have a working draft ready in minutes, with problem statements, starter code, and test cases proposed for you, and you owning the final published version.
uRecruits provides AI-assist tools to support customer assessment design. Customers remain responsible for the assessment content they publish, including applicable U.S. fair-hiring obligations (such as Title VII disparate-impact considerations and the ADA) and any validation studies their assessment program requires.
Assessment Agent assists with drafting assessment content. AI outputs may be incomplete or incorrect and require user review. Assessment Agent does not publish assessments without recruiter approval.